History 592: Twentieth-Century Russia
Spring 2009, MWF 1:30, EH 211
Professor David Stone
Office: EH 318
email: stone@ksu.edu
phone: 532-6730
This course will cover the history of Russia from the middle of the
19th century up to the present day. It will look at the origins
of the Russian Revolution, the creation of a new communist Soviet
Union, and the collapse of that system and the building of a new
Russia. I have structured the course and the assignments so that you
will:
1) learn the historical content of this period by becoming familiar
with the most important people, ideas, and events of Russian history in
the twentieth century.
2) gain some historical perspective by studying a country whose
experiences have been very different than our own and a political
ideology very different from our own.
3) understand the most important trends, forces, and ideologies shaping
Russian history.
4) improve your communications skills by writing papers analyzing
important issues in twentieth-century Russia and discussing primary
sources readings about Russian history.
Please read this syllabus carefully. Most of your questions about
the class are answered here. If you don't find your answer here,
please feel free to ask me for clarification.
TEXTS TO PURCHASE (available in
the Union and at Varney's). Feel free to purchase them online if
you choose: use the ISBN # below to make sure you get the right book.
Robert Daniels, ed., A Documentary History of Communism: Communism in
Russia (0-87451-616-6)
Robert Daniels, ed., Soviet Communism from Reform to Collapse
(0-669-33144-9)
Riasanovsky and Steinberg, A History of Russia since 1855
(0-19-515393-6)
John Scott, Behind the Urals (0-253-20536-0)
David Stone, A Military History of Russia (0-275-98502-4)
GRADE BREAKDOWN:
20 points 1st paper
(Leninism)
20
2nd paper (Stalinism)
20
3rd paper (Gorbachev)
20
midterm examination
30
final examination
30
10 quizzes at 4 points each
20
participation
--
160 total points possible
REQUIREMENTS:
1) READING. I expect you to keep up with the reading
2) ATTENDANCE. I notice who comes to class regularly and who does
not. Attendance and participation will affect your final
grade. Not attending will also hurt your comprehension of the
material. The lectures and readings supplement but do not replace
one another. If you miss class, getting the notes is YOUR
responsibility; do not ask me for them.
3) PARTICIPATION. This class has both lectures and
discussions. Even during lectures, I welcome your questions,
comments, and contributions. Discussion days, usually Fridays,
depend on your participation, and you will be graded on your
participation and preparation. If you have trouble talking in
class, see me. You will still need to participate.
4) WRITING. You will write three papers during the semester, each
of about 1250 words. Due dates are listed on the syllabus;
detailed topics will be distributed two weeks before the papers are
due. I expect papers to be handed in on time, and late papers
will be marked down 10% for each day they are late.
5) EXAMS. We will have a midterm exam and a final, consisting of
short IDs and essay questions over the lectures and readings. The
final will cover only material since the midterm.
6) QUIZZES. Discussion days will begin with short quizzes over
the assigned reading. These quizzes will be OPEN NOTE but NOT
OPEN BOOK, so you should take reading notes as you go.
7) EMAIL ACCOUNT. All of you will be automatically subscribed to
the class listserv. Important course information will be
distributed via email, so you need to check your account regularly.
CLASS SCHEDULE.
January 16: Intro to course. Reading: R & S, pp. xxv-xxxi.
January 19: NO CLASS. UNIVERSITY HOLIDAY.
January 21: The Crimean War and the Great Reforms, pt. I.
Reading: R & S, pp. 341-348; Stone, pp. 118-125.
January 23: The Great Reforms, pt. II. Reading: R & S, pp.
348-353, 357-61; Stone, Chap. 9.
January 26: Economic and Social Change. Reading: R & S,
pp. 396-402, 407-414.
January 28: Nicholas II. Reading: R & S, 362-371.
January 30: Discussion: Revolutionary movement. Reading: Bakunin's
Revolutionary
Catechism," "Preconditions
for a Social Revolution in Russia," Nechaev's "Revolutionary
Catechism" (not the same as Bakunin's).
February 2: The Russian Countryside. Reading: R & S,
pp. 402-407.
February 4: Revolutionary Ideologies. Reading: R & S, pp.
353-357, 432-438.
February 6: The 1905 Revolution. Reading: R & S, pp.
371-385; Stone, Chap. 10.
February 9: Reform and War. Reading: R & S, pp. 385-392.
February 11: World War I. Reading: R & S, pp. 392-395; Stone,
Chap. 11.
February 13: Discussion: Leninism. Reading: R & S, pp.
451-459; Documentary History, Chap. 1, pp. 3-41.
February 16: February Revolution. Reading: R & S, pp.
435-447.
February 18: October Revolution. Reading: R & S, pp. 447-450.
February 20: Discussion: 1917. Reading: Documentary History, pp.
42-72.
February 23: Civil War, pt. 1. Reading: R & S, pp. 460-466;
Stone, pp. 176-183.
February 25: Civil War, pt. 2. Reading: R & S, pp. 466-474.
February 27: Discussion: The New State. Reading: Documentary
History, pp. 72-113.
March 2: The New Economic Policy. R & S, pp. 474-477; Documentary
History, pp. 113-123; Stone, pp. 183-186.
FIRST PAPER ON LENINISM DUE ON March 2 IN CLASS.
March 4: The Succession Struggle. Reading: R & S, pp. 477-481.
March 6: Discussion: Trotskyism and Opposition. Reading:
Documentary History, pp. 124-176.
March 9 : Industrialization and Collectivization. Reading: R
& S, pp. 483-494.
March 11: Discussion: Industrialization. Reading: Scott, pp. 1
170; Documentary History, pp. 177-197.
March 13: MIDTERM EXAM
March 16-20: SPRING BREAK
March 23: Soviet Union and World Revolution. Reading: R & S,
pp. 501-506;
March 25: The Great Purges. Reading: R & S, pp. 494-500.
March 27: Discussion: Purges. Reading: Scott, pp. 173-306; Documentary
History, pp. 197-222.
March 30: The Approach of World War. Reading: R & S, pp.
506-508; Stone, pp. 186-190.
SECOND PAPER ON STALINISM DUE ON MONDAY, MARCH 30, IN CLASS.
April 1: World War II, pt. 1. Reading: R & S, pp. 508-516;
Stone, Chap. 13.
April 3: World War II, pt. 2. Reading: Documentary History, pp.
223-234.
April 6: Origins of the Cold War. Reading: R & S, pp. 522-528.
April 8: Stalin's Last Years and Khrushchev’s Succession.
Reading: R & S, pp. 517-522; Documentary History, pp. 235-245.
April 10: Discussion: Destalinization. Reading: R & S, pp.
546-548; Documentary History, pp. 246-272
April 13: Khrushchev's Rule and Fall. Reading: R & S, pp.
529-533; Documentary History, pp. 273-279.
April 15: Brezhnev. Reading: R & S, pp. 534-545, 556-583.
April 17: Discussion: Reforming the system. Reading: Reform to
Collapse, pp. 35-47; Documentary History, pp. 280-283, 286-289,
302-306, 313-322.
April 20: Continuing Cold War. Reading: R & S, pp. 548-555;
Stone, Chap. 14.
April 22: Gerontocracy and Gorbachev’s Rise to Power. Reading: R
& S, pp. 584-591; Documentary History, pp. 323-336; Reform to
Collapse, pp. 69-110, 121-140.
April 24: Discussion: Dissidents. Reading: Reform to Collapse,
pp. 17-25; Documentary History, pp. 284-5, 290-301, 307-312.
April 27: Reform and Collapse. Reading: Reform to Collapse, pp.
143-216, 231-253, 268-299; Stone, pp. 236-241.
April 29:. Discussion: Growth of Nationalism. Reading: R & S,
pp. 591-597; Reform to Collapse, pp. 111-121; 216-229; 299-311.
May 1: Coup and Disintegration. Reading: R & S, pp. 597-607;
Documentary History, pp. 373-393; Reform to Collapse, pp. 253-268,
311-319.
THIRD PAPER ON GORBACHEV DUE Friday, May 1, IN CLASS.
May 4: Yeltsin’s Russia. Reading: R & S, pp. 609-625, 641-665.
May 6: Putin's Russia. Reading: R & S, pp. 625-640; Stone,
pp. 242-247.
May 8: Ossetia and a New Cold War?
FINAL EXAM.
POTENTIAL PROBLEMS:
INCOMPLETES. The KSU policy on incompletes states
(http://courses.ksu.edu/catalog/undergraduate/grades/):
The grade of Incomplete (I) is given in regular
courses . . . upon request of the student for personal emergencies that
are verifiable. The faculty member has the responsibility to provide
written notification to the student of work required to remove the
incomplete. The student has the responsibility to take the initiative
in completing the work, and is expected to make up the incomplete
during the first semester (enrolled) at the university after receiving
the grade of I. If the student does not make up the incomplete
during the first semester in residence at the university after
receiving it, a grade may be given by the faculty member without
further consultation with the student.
ACADEMIC HONESTY, CHEATING, AND PLAGIARISM
I expect students to work honestly, and the vast majority of students
do. Every semester, however, I catch one or two students
cheating, and my policy on cheating is to assign a grade of F for the
course and turn in the student involved to the Honor System.
From the Honor System website (http://www.ksu.edu/honor):
Kansas State University has an Undergraduate Honor
System based on personal integrity which is presumed to be sufficient
assurance in academic matters one's work is performed honestly and
without unauthorized assistance. Undergraduate students, by
registration, acknowledge the jurisdiction of the Undergraduate Honor
System. The policies and procedures of the Undergraduate Honor
System apply to all full and part-time students enrolled in
undergraduate courses on-campus, off-campus, and via distance learning.
A component vital to the Honor System is the
inclusion of the Honor Pledge which applies to all assignments,
examinations, or other course work undertaken by undergraduate
students. The Honor Pledge is implied, whether or not it is
stated: "On my honor, as a student, I have neither given nor
received unauthorized aid on this academic work."
A grade of XF can result from a breach of academic
honesty. An XF would be failure of the course with the X on the
transcript indicating failure as a result of a breach of academic
honesty.
There are two main types of academic dishonesty that concern me in this
course. The first is cheating on quizzes and exams. While
this happens relatively rarely given the type of exams I give, any
cheating of this sort (crib sheets, copying from a neighbor) is grounds
for failing the course and a referral to the Honor System.
The more common type of academic dishonesty, in my experience, is
plagiarism on papers.
WHAT IS PLAGIARISM?
Plagiarism is presenting someone else's work as your own. This
can involve turning in a paper written by someone else, taking a paper
from the internet, or not properly giving credit to sources. For
another definition, see the Honor System's discussion at
http://www.ksu.edu/honor/examples.htm
WHY IS PLAGIARISM WRONG?
Plagiarism combines lying and stealing. Plagiarizing is lying,
because it falsely claims credit for work actually done by someone
else. It is stealing, because it takes the product of someone
else's labor.
Plagiarism also makes the exchange of ideas impossible. How can
you trust what someone tells you if you can't check it yourself?
You need to be able to examine evidence for yourself to be sure that an
argument makes sense, but you can't do that if the sources aren't
available.
HOW DO I AVOID PLAGIARISM?
Avoiding plagiarism is simple. You need to do two things.
First, if you take an idea, concept, or fact from someone else, you
must give credit to your source. That's usually done through a
footnote, endnote, or parenthetical reference. HOW exactly you
give credit isn't so important; what's important is actually doing it.
Second, if you use someone else's exact words, you have to indicate
that. Otherwise, you're taking credit for someone else's
work. You indicate your use of exact words by quotation marks (or
a blocked quote for longer quotations) around the passages you've
taken, and some sort of reference to the source.
Plagiarism is disregarding either one of these rules: taking
information without giving credit, or taking someone else's language
without showing that and giving credit.
WHAT ABOUT THE INTERNET?
Information on the internet is no different than information in books
and other printed sources. If you take ideas or exact words from
the internet without giving credit, you have lied about your work,
stolen someone else's work, and committed plagiarism.
Identifying your sources is even more important with internet
sources. While getting a book published involves getting an
editor and a publisher to agree that your work is worthwhile, any idiot
can put absolutely anything on the net. Wouldn't you like to know
if your information about Hitler, for example, comes from the American
Nazi Party?